Signs of possible cardiac damage have been found in some marathoners. More screening may be wise, a researcher says.
By Cameron Walker, Special to The Times
April 16, 2007
In the marathon’s early days, runners who churned through its 26.2-mile course were thought to be putting their lives on the line. “People used to watch these races to see if anything bad would happen,” said Dr. Paul Thompson, director of cardiology at Hartford Hospital in Connecticut.
“There’s always been this concern that this amount of exercise could be dangerous.”
As runners start the 111th Boston marathon this morning, these suspicions have gotten a second wind.
In 2006, a year with more fatalities than usual in U.S. marathons, two men died during the Los Angeles Marathon, and at least four more died in other big-city marathons.
These deaths have been coupled with recent studies of runners that have revealed signs of possible heart damage immediately following a marathon.
In a study published in November in the journal Circulation, researchers reported elevated levels of a protein called troponin in a group of runners 20 minutes after finishing the Boston Marathon. When heart muscle cells die or are damaged, their membranes leak, and troponin is one of the things that spills out. Emergency-room doctors check troponin levels in the blood as one way of diagnosing heart attacks.
Forty percent of the runners had levels high enough to suggest heart damage. Runners who had trained 35 miles or fewer each week produced more troponin than those who ran more than 45 miles a week.
Stanford University School of Medicine researchers also found high troponin levels in a quarter of the 48 runners they tested after the Silicon Valley Marathon in October. “If I saw them in the emergency department, I would tell them they had a heart attack,” says Dr. Suzanne Miller, a resident in emergency medicine.
But none of the runners had chest pains or other medical problems. Training didn’t seem to affect how much troponin they released. The next day, their troponin levels were back to normal.
“I don’t want anyone to be afraid of running a marathon because of my study,” says Miller, who is submitting a manuscript for publication.
“But we do need people to do more studies to determine what this means, and we certainly need people to be in good shape when they’re [running a marathon].”
These changes in the heart seem transient, researchers say. “I don’t think you should worry excessively about damaging your heart, because there’s not any evidence that you are,” says Thompson, who finished 16th in the Boston Marathon in 1976.
That doesn’t mean marathon running is risk-free, he says. For most, the boost to heart health that comes from running outweighs the chance of having a heart attack while exercising. But for people with known heart problems, and those who unknowingly harbor ailments under a healthy facade, the risk of marathon running may trump benefits, he says.
A German study of more than 100 experienced marathon runners without known cardiac risks, ages 50 and older, found they had more calcium deposits in their arteries than a control group of nonrunners, suggesting a higher likelihood of atherosclerosis, or plaque buildup in arteries, in the marathoners.
These runners would likely have had more heart problems if they hadn’t been running, says Dr. Stefan MÃ¶hlenkamp, a cardiologist at UniversitÃ¤tsklinik Essen, who presented these findings at an American Heart Assn. meeting last year. Yet the results suggest that screening, particularly for older men with a stockpile of risk factors, he says, is critical in determining whether to run a marathon.
MÃ¶hlenkamp recommends that electron-beam CT scans, which measure arterial calcium deposits, be considered for older men with risk factors.
But heart tests such as these aren’t usually seen as costeffective in runners without risk factors, says Dr. Michael Miller, director of the Center for Preventive Cardiology at the University of Maryland Medical Center. Miller, who reported last month on a 51-year-old marathoner who had calcium-coated arteries despite no cardiac risk factors, recommends that marathon runners have stress tests before starting to train, even if they don’t have known cardiac risks.
If you’re starting marathon training, consider checking with your doctor first, says Dr. Allison Kean, a cardiologist and assistant clinical professor at UCLA School of Medicine, particularly if you’re older than 40 or have risk factors such as high cholesterol, high blood pressure or a family history of heart disease.
Once you’re logging the miles, pay attention if your body complains. “When you’re a marathoner,” says Dr. Alice Perlowski, a UCLA cardiology fellow, “you just ignore aches and pains.” Most people, she says, have some sort of warning sign before a cardiac event â€” so runners should take seriously hints such as chest pain and unusual shortness of breath.
Perlowski knows something about aches and pains too. Today, she’s running her third Boston Marathon.